In all A/V, there are elements of brand puffery (pricing by which label is on the thing) and legit hardware advantages. What do they say? Why is it only $60? Reviewers will likely lay out whatever is making it cost so little. Yes, brand name may play a part, but that's likely too much difference on brand name alone. There is very likely reasons why one you are looking at is $60 vs. I don't think that's what you are getting here. Is a set of $50,000 speakers that much better than a set of $500 speakers? There's probably some bona-fide rationalization in those differences. For example, try seriously shopping speakers sometime if you want to see seemingly insane price variances for what might mostly look and sound about the same. Why is the phone you have better than some other company's phone "that does the same thing?" Why is the computer you have better than some other company's computer "that does the same thing?" Why is the car you drive better or not as good as cars that cost much less or much more than yours when "all cars do the same thing"? Etc.Īll of that kind of thing applies with all home A/V equipment. though I would expect $1000 to be buying 4K blu ray playback while only $60 might be HD Blu Ray only.
MACGO BLU RAY PLAYER PRO BOOKMARK TV
$1000 won't be buying you upwards of 16X better video quality to your TV or similar. $60 is probably either no-name or brand known for cheap builds vs.
My guess is that a $60 Blu-ray player is probably going to conk long before a $1000 Blu-ray player. However, with that much difference ($60 vs $1000+), it's probably some build (maybe metal instead of plastic bits & pieces), maybe some select hardware inside is considered better than others and then maybe some brand name commanding a premium vs. Read reviews and objective reviewers will probably point out some things that one has and the other does not.
There's probably some differences that may or may not matter to you. Carefully scrutinize features & benefits, warranty, etc.
0 kommentar(er)
